Welcome
About Us
The Work Itself
Public Relations
Resources
Discussion Group
What's New

 

Copyright Notice:

Be advised that "Narcotics Anonymous", the stylized initials NA (appearing alone, within a single or double circle) and the diamond within a circle symbol are registered trademarks of Narcotics Anonymous World Services, Inc.  All other logos and trademarks on this site are the property of their respective owners.

[ Concepts ] Contact ] Site Map ] Search ]
 

Concept Seven

"All members of a service body bear substantial responsibility for that body's decisions and should be allowed to fully participate in its decision-making processes."

The Seventh concept teaches us that all members of our service teams should truly participate in the teams’ decision-making processes.

The Seventh concept teaches us that all members of our service teams should truly participate in the teams’ decision-making processes.

The Seventh concept teaches us that all members of our service teams should truly participate in the teams’ decision-making processes.

All contributions count, and maximum involvement yields sound, sensitive service decisions. We welcome the Sixth Concept’s idea that individual consciences combine and interact to form a collective group conscience.

When applied conscientiously, the seventh concept tends to equalize each contributing voice in relation to the whole. The seventh concept also points out the reason we encourage full participation in our decision-making processes; it is because each person who helps make the committee’s collective decision on some issue bears substantial responsibility for his and her individual decisions.

Full participation in discussion is essential to good decision-making. If a committee discovers that full discussion is frequently limited due to time constraints, it may wish to consider changing the length or the frequency of its meetings.

Full discussion, of course, does not mean unlimited discussion with several members speaking repeatedly during the discussion. The chairperson may need to implement discussion tools to help manage the meeting. Some of these tools including limiting the number of pros and cons which may be discussed on each issue; calling on each individual only once or twice during each discussion; or limiting the time any one individual may speak on a particular issue. If any of these methods is used, it must be consistently implemented to ensure fairness, and so that each person present understands the committee’s protocol for equitable participation.

Although full participation does not necessarily mean that each person in the room is permitted a vote, a committee’s voting procedures should always be clearly stated, perhaps in its guidelines. Being inclusive, however, is always preferable to being exclusive. Committees often work by consensus and vote only when consensus is not reached."


Back ] Next ]
 

This Page Last Edited 25 October 2009
 © 1999-2009
NA-PR.ORG
All Rights Reserved